An Analysis of Walt Disney’s Cinderella

invoke fibres (2007) 56717727 DOI 10. 1007/s11199-007-9236-y ORIGINAL oblige The Production of Meaning by dint of and with Peer Interaction Children and Walt Disneys Cinderella Lori Baker-Sperry produce online 5 June 2007 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract For some geezerhood queryers induce understood that sexual activity roles in barbarianrens literature moderate the capacity to create and reinforce importees of femininity and masculinity (Currie, Gend. Soc. , 11 453477, 1997 Gledhill, music genre and sex activity The upshot of muck opera. In S. Hall (Ed. ), Re bearation (pp. 339383). capital of the United Kingdom Sage, 1985 Tatar, Off with their heads Fairy write ups and the floriculture of childhood. Princeton, NJ Princeton Univer teasey Press, 1993 Zipes, Happily ever subsequently. sweetfound York R come outledge, 1997).The resolve of this subscribe to was to investigate childrens rendition of a universal gendered milksop tale at the train of accomplice fundamental interaction. Walt Disneys Cinderella was utilize in elementary school command concourses to investigate the ways that children go steady messages regarding gender and the influence of confederate culture on the doing of meaning. The findings head that gender and gendered expectations were essential to the process of feature and the construction of eaning for the children. Gender unify the boys and lady associates into cardinal distinct sort outs, curiously tumesce-nigh the daughters book, Cinderella.Gender was reinforced on traditional lines in the peer host, serving as a curb to the takings of surrogate interpretations to traditional messages in the textbook. Keywords Gender . Peer interaction . Children . Agency . Cinderella Introduction Childrens literature has long been cited as a vehicle for the transmission of gendered values and messages (Weitzman et L. Baker-Sperry (*) Department of Womens Studies, westernern Il linois University, vitamin D Currens Hall, Macomb, IL 61455, USA -mail emailprotected edu al. 1972 Agee 1993 Zipes 1997). The ability of childrens literature to impart meaning and reflect neighborly constructions of masculinity and femininity to its readers has excessively been documented (Currie 1997 Gledhill 1985 Zipes 1997). to a greater expiration than recently, crabbed concern has been paid to the influence of peer culture in the construction of meaning derived from media sources, childrens literature included (Corsaro 1997 Currie 1997 Davies 1990 Milkie 1994 Pike and Jennings 2005). The purpose of the evince study was to examine how childrens peer culture influences the interpretation of endered messages derived from childrens literature. Interpretive Reproduction and Childrens Peer Culture Children ar inventive and resourceful kindly participants in the preservation (reproduction), interpretation, and rowation of their br oppositely manhood as they right away interpret the affectionate world by constructing the meaning of social messages (Corsaro 1997, 1992). Corsaro (1997) stated that children quickly appropriate, engagement, and transform symbolic culture as they produce and participate in peer culture (p. 100).This grab of the childs active interpretation of the social world, termed instructive reproduction, conceptualizes hildren as research participants and social psyches. Children appropriate messages and meanings from the world of adults and filter them through their testify go throughing and experiences. Childrens responses to social messages betoken their ability to understand and acquit meaning of the social world. This does non occur simply as the childs reaction to social messaging, however. The process of interpretation is most effectively negotiated at the level of interaction where understanding is conceptualized, organized, and reconfirm through peer identity operator (Corsaro 1997 Currie 1997 Davies 1990 Mill er et al. 990).Through interaction that occurs deep down e precise(prenominal)day routines (Corsaro 1997), Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 718 children ar adequate to(p) to learn the rules of the social group in which they ar a part. Interaction in the peer group overly solidifies gendered perspectives (Hibbard and Buhrmester 1998 Thorne 1997). acting out gender, as sound as sometimes pushing its boundaries, is a great deal manifested in the peer group. Children discursively side of meat themselves as boys or lady friends in their feed, thus reifying the dichotomous nature of the construction of gender through peer interaction (Davies 2003 Hibbard and Buhrmester 1998).Children in like manner rely heavily on traditional normative social structures to make wizard of the world, and they practically wear upon gendered expectations as impartiality. The process of internalisation and negotiation of messages becomes unique in relation to gender when unrivaled considers the primacy of gendered norms and expectations. Do children support the social freedom to search and perhaps deconstruct gendered messages at bottom the peer group, or atomic number 18 gendered roles and expectations simply too rigid to chuck up the sponge that? Gendered Messages and the Peer Group Prescription or Negotiation?Scholars fool set fay tales as vehicles of gendered messages and forms of prescriptive literature for children (Baker-Sperry and Grauerholz 2003 Bettelheim 1976 Tatar 1993 Zipes 1997), and an separate(prenominal)s keep argued that such gendered messages argon interpreted and reinforced through peer interaction (Corsaro 1997 Milkie 1994). Corsaro (1997, p. 4) set childrens literature, finickyly sissy tales, as important sources that be in general mediated by adults in cultural routines in the family and former(a) places. The excogitation of the fork up study was non to document which essages ar gendered, only how gendered messages atomic number 18 understood and internalized by children and, further, the ways that such tales argon interpreted through peer interaction.The smooth, gendered messages and the highly structured form of the fairy tale abide a vehicle for children to interpret gendered norms and expectations more than all the way. The well-known tale Cinderella was elect for its clear, traditional depiction of gendered expectations, fantasy, and romantic love as well as for its current position as a feminine text contain to the world of girls in its recent production and advertisement (e. g. a invention central to the Disney Princesses) (Shumway 2003 Zipes 1997). Cinderella is a tale that focuses on girls and women, with predominantly fe virile comp mavin and only(a)nt parts. Boys argon not comparablely to conjoin a female main grapheme (Hibbard and Buhrmester 1998 Pike and Jennings 2005). Girls, however, are a good deal willing to embrace a male main extension such the universal children s quotation, Harry Potter, for example. Choosing Cinderella for the present study was an intentional way to clarify the reactions to a book clearly let on as targeting unity sex and not the some former(a).The choice of a feminine text that lluminates this relationship amid boys, girls, and gendered text was deliberate. Fairy tale scholar Jack Zipes (1997) has argued that, currently, childrens understanding and image associations of the fairy tale Cinderella are so tight linked with the fairylike film Cinderella (Disney 1950) that they are inseparable. Based on the expectation that the children whitethorn describe Disneys animated images even so when not referenced, and that this faculty lead to the incorrect assumption that the children were exploring leap ways of obese the recital when in fact they were reproducing the opular Disney image, a textual version of Walt Disneys Cinderella that contained some of the well-known images from the animated film was selected for use in the present study. An analysis of Walt Disneys Cinderella, in preparation for data collection, produced several themes. These assertions are mounted by Shumways (2003) assertions concerning traditional feminine text and in Grauerholz and Baker-Sperrys (2007) findings on pervasive themes at bottom popular Grimms tales. These themes guided, but did not limit, the discussion and influenced the examinations asked of students during the class period groups.Romantic Love The text is a romantic tale in that love and/or marriage are driving forces and the text deals with love that leads to marriage or love after-school(prenominal) of marriage, but not love in marriage (Shumway 2003, p. 3). The tales inevitable culmination in marriage, coupled with elements of love at offset sight and the concurrent contender among women for the prince, is pivotal to the overall action of the narrative Cinderella. The search for a suitable marriage partner for the prince is the reason for t he ball. Gendered Role Expectations in Disneys Cinderella Although the stepmother and stepsisters do not engage in raditional national cook, Cinderella is required to do so. All women in the text are interested with carnal expression of self or other and clearly understand this to convey direct impact on the ability to procure a suitable mate. Men in the tale fill traditionally male status roles king, prince, and ambassador. The men have obvious social tycoon the women grapple to attain or maintain status on their own. Transformation Cinderella is change from a dutiful and submissive girl impris integrityd in a domestic world to a fine-looking and enviable young fair sex thrust into the frequent and both desired and sought by the prince.Transformation whitethorn be highly Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 piquant to young girls, disposed(p) the tendency to link femininity with beauty, desirability, and marriage suitability. Boys may or may not be employ to experiencing the p rogression of a male character or the development of masculinity in such a way. deli precise boy and Rescued Although the mans role is de- punctuated in this tale, the Cinderella baloney is one of trial, rescue, and redemption (re whirl to rightful place). The prince, who offers Cinderella an escape from her dire circumstances, is the true rescuer. This construct serves to support traditional notions almost asculinity and femininity. Importance of Physical Beauty Cinderella is place as good and industrious, but she is also very beautiful. It is her beauty that starting attracts the prince, as well as her mystery, and it is her beauty (symbolic in the form of a elegant foot encased in glass) that confirms her place as rightful bride. house servant slavery also hid her physical beauty.The Lack of a Pivotal manly Role This is really a story approximately girls and women, and the young prince does not process a central action role. The king and his advisor, although both male and powerful by their status, re relatively asexual and are juvenilized in the portrayal of their antics. The pro scoreonist is female (Cinderella), and the key supporting characters are also female the wicked stepmother, unattractive stepsisters, and the fairy godmother. The decentralization of male character further instantiates this tale as a feminine love story (Shumway 2003). These themes situate the text, Cinderella, as a highly gendered and traditionally normative story through which an analysis of interpretations as negotiated in peer groups may occur.In the present study I explored the following research questions about the ways that gendered messages re understood, appropriated, or reinvented through interaction How does the peer group influence the production of meaning concerning gendered messages? Do boys and girls contribute to the production of meaning in the peer groups in confusable ways? To what extent do boys and girls reject or accept the tale as about them? To what extent do the children accept the traditional gender representations without question? Do they produce interpretations that displace traditional stereotypes and gendered expectations? Analysis of these questions, through the lens of symbolic interaction and the sociology of childhood, serves to lluminate the relationship between gendered text and the daily world of the child. 719 Method Setting and Participants To collect the data for this project, I participated in informal, intensive, preliminary observation of 148 students in eight first-grade classrooms. In six of the eight classrooms, a total of 50 students participated in breeding groups. Each nurture group contained between nine and nine children, neverthe wee for one group of 11 participants. Walt Disneys version of Cinderella (Disney 1986) was the subject yield for distributively reading group. All students involved were either 6 or 7 years old and were in the first grade.All data were self-collected in a publi c elementary school serving a midwestern rural area (population 21,659). The childrens socioeconomic backgrounds ranged from uppermiddle class (parents a great deal university employed with high educational attainment) to children with unemployed heads of households (the area experience two factory closings immediately prior to data collection). The participants were otherwise relatively homogenous. The volume of children had workings parents and either single, two-parent, or blended families. Eighty-nine percent of the children in the study were European American, 8% were AfricanAmerican, and 3% were Asian American. These numbers are representative of the larger population for the area (U. S. Bureau of the Census 2000). At all possible times, reading groups were conducted when Children of Color were present (e. g. , scheduling around sick days). The reading groups were formed by classroom, and consisted only of children who met the criteria first-grade status, a willingness to participate, and a consent form scrapeed by a parent or guardian. As a member of the university community, I was granted admission in the classroom by the principal and because by each(prenominal) individual teacher.The local university houses a successful elementary education program, and the number of university associates at the school at any given time is quite large. student teachers, researchers, facilitators, and assessors are present throughout the regular school year. The students and teachers were very golden and quickly became accustomed to my presence. Procedure Preliminary Observation The use of instructive ethnographic methods (Corsaro 1997 Eder and Corsaro 1999) has become more prominent since researchers began to explore the meaning of social processes from the perspective of those studied (Corsaro 997, p. 75). To become familiar with how children actively engaged in group work, as opposed to working Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 720 on an individual basis or as a larger class, I engaged in preliminary observation of eight first-grade classrooms over a 3 month period for approximately 4 h/week.Observation occurred during the childrens classroom reading time, scheduled time to work in groups, and/or time normally scheduled for extra activities, such as movies. This time spend in the elementary school was an introduction to the nature of these public routines and to the research participants. I then(prenominal) ngaged in the primary data collection by conducting reading groups with the children. Reading Groups Data collection occurred in structured reading groups to explore the ways that children negotiate peer relationships in a small group around the highly traditional and gendered fairy tale, Cinderella. The reading groups were chosen as the primary method of data collection because they were naturally occurring and leave behindd a flexible, serious constant routine in the childrens school day, one where intentional learning was con ducted while children were encouraged to think and work in groups.The genius and format of the reading groups closely resembled the uncouth in-class format. For this study, I invited the children to come sit on the floor and hear me read the tale Cinderella (Disney 1986) as was their usual way. All children chose to participate, although they were given the option to decline. I allowed the children to discuss the illustrations and make interjections throughout the tale, though they were accustomed to a pattern of listening while the story was read and of asking any questions afterward. Overall, the nimbus of the reading group was very relaxed. Control over the attention of the group was fairly asy to maintain, due in large part to the childrens familiarity with the reading group structure and with organism read to by adults other than the teacher (e. g. , parents ofttimes did this). Each reading group was recorded using a video camera on a tripod in a corner of the classroom. As the classrooms were small, I was able to capture the reading group interaction, albeit from only one angle. The students did not to oppose to the camera as I had anticipated. After the initial set-up occurred, they ignored the camera. I later transcribed all tapes and typed my observation notes myself. I am identify in the transcripts as LBS.All students name calling were changed. Results To become familiar with the environment, I frequently asked the children questions, engaged in their play, and physically joined them as they learned (e. g. , I sometimes sat with the group on the floor). Initially, the students questioned my role in their classrooms and wondered why I did not actively participate in the regular work in a normative adult way as a student teacher or librarian might. Quickly, the children became accustomed to my presence, and I was concisely the object of friendly and playful competition. Students would often ask to sit by me during an activity r ask me to come o ut and play tag with us while lining up for recess. In conjunction with what Davies (2003) found, by not behaving in an authoritative way, I was quickly welcomed into the childrens activities.The children did not forget that I was an adult, as evidenced in the following repeat from field notes, but often used my age to situational advantage The children compete stroke from the chair today during free time. I was invited to play and concur to sit on the chair while one team of children tested to knock me off. Soon thither were cries of no fair, she is too hard to knock off immediately followed by a discussion about how to reconfigure the teams so that I was on theirs Before we determined membership, the game was halted by the teaching assistant for roughness (observation notes, October 1999). There were also times when my adult status was obvious and irrevocable. For example, one day a boy fell backwards in his chair and hit his head on the floor.Immediately, I stepped outdoor(a ) of my role of observer and confidante and assumed adult status. There were times when the children became alternatively more formal in their interactions with me, such as when I became a reader, a role often filled by eacher, parent, or other adult. I also believe that the reading groups, although they occurred only once with each group of children, underscored my adult status. This meant that, at times, the children and I interacted more formally, whereas at other times I was easily invited into the game or activity. The interactions below are representative of what occurred during the reading groups, and are infused with a familiarity between myself and the children, but are also reflective of the structured routine of the reading group and and then are more reserved in nature than other forms of interaction that occurred.Gendered Role Expectations The children were very familiar with the Disney version of the fairy tale, Cinderella. They k newly the story well enough to finis h my sentences as I read. When I read On Cinderella s feet were tiny. , many immediately responded with glass slippers. Similarly, many of the students joined in at the end of the tale with happily every after In fact, the students knew the story so well ( oddly show by the girls), and were at times Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 so caught up in the tale, that they jumped frontward in their excitement, finishing the story long before the end.Many students also knew the names of Cinderellas animal friends, an element unique to the Disney version. In the reading groups, sterile views of traditional gender expectations were reproduced in the childrens accounts of the tale. When asked about Cinderellas physical appearance prior to the reading of the tale, the children responded with a characterization of Cinderella that is consistent of Disneys well-known image. The childrens description of Cinderellas nature was also static and highly traditional, in keeping with the text. Cinderella was determine as beautiful, nice, deserving of riends, and as skilled in domestic tasks. These are highly emphasized elements in spite of appearance the tale and were consistently linked to one another(prenominal) by the children in the reading groups. The students did not problematize this imagery. The students characterized the stepsisters as monstrous, mean, and inept in feminine skills.Therefore, they identified them in ways that were, for the most part, consistent with the text. The stepmother was draw in ways that reflect her characterization in the story, both in text and in pictures. For example, Cinderellas father, at the beginning of the tale, is shown as a young man, possibly in his late 20s, ppropriate for the father of a young girl. Concurrently, the stepmother is illustrated as gray, older, and very matronly. The students indicated that they noticed some of the inconsistency. Linda Her hair is gray. Carol She is old. LBS Right, she is older. Ben She is 100 years o ld. Those are her grandchildren. LBS She is 100 years old? un slight those are her daughters. Laughter and exclamations of No from the students. The students, particularly the girls, were aware of the stepmother s lack of beauty. Her appearance, age, and the fact that she is mean were often discussed.She was not defended as a mother or as a person. No child make a positive statement about the stepmother or her behavior. The prince was characterized positively by the girls, who cut him as a romantic character. The girls described the prince as handsome, although the text did not. There is no mention of handsomeness in the tale Cinderella (BakerSperry and Grauerholz 2003). LBS What does the prince look like? Brooke Handsome Jill Charming. Gary Whats that mean? bank That is his name. LBS What does charming mean? Marge Thats his name Jill He is beautiful, handsome. Brooke He is dreamy. 721Although the text does not identify the Prince as handsome, charming, or dreamy, these names w ere often linked to this character by the girls, particularly when asked (specifically and repeatedly) about his appearance. The students did not once, however, respond that they did not know what the prince looks like or that the book does not provide that information textually, nor did they make reference to the images offered in the books illustrations. Nor did they indicate that he was not attractive or balk at the question. The text does offer much insight as to the princes personality, and the students did not elaborate.In the anterior excerpt, the prince was also identified as charming, a commonly used identification for many fairy tale princes, but Marge could not typeset charming except to advance that is his name. Davies (2003), in her work with children and feminist fairy tales, found that the belief that the primary male or female character will be attractive supersedes textual portrayals. This is the case here, possibly because attractor is more in keeping with t he romantic nature of the tale. The children did not question the basic gendered assumptions embodied in many images and characterizations in the text, nor did they explore alternatives.For example, no child commented that the stepmother is not motherly toward Cinderella, that she does not look motherly, or that her personality does not forgather with what one might associate with mothering, although her physical appearance is inconsistent with popular images of mothers, which was mentioned (see above). No child questioned Cinderellas desire to draw the prince. Such consistency across responses indicates that this group of children accepts many of the normative gendered images within the text without overtly questioning them, yet questioned those that do not fit expectations (as the stepmother s ppearance). Corsaro (1997, p. 20) argued that confusions are addressed but not resolved in routines, but these reading groups served as routines where basic gendered assumptions were negot iated and interpreted, but not inevitably problematized or resisted. The Girls in the Group Cinderella as a Site of femininity Retelling the Tale A Form of Social Power The girls in the present study often found social power or adoption in the retelling of the tale. For the girls, there was more at stake in telling the story as it was read, than in changing the story to reflect less traditional roles and behaviors.This was documented in numerous ways for example, one girl was quickly admonished by another for suggesting that maybe Cinderella did not like her semblance ball dress. In keeping with West and Zimmermans (1987) theory of gender work and performance, the girls exigencyed to 722 be perceived as feminine and, then, to call down their femininity through sharing components of the tale within the peer group. By retelling and defending the tale as it was read, they reinforced their positions as girls and as informal of the feminine world. Assertion of femininity was mos t influential with other girls, but the oys did not problematize the girls interest (as they did with other boys). These examples lead to questions about the extent to which doing gender (West and Zimmerman 1987) influences the process of interpretation and the construction of meaning within the peer group. If active negotiation is about sometimes resisting dominant messages in favor of working out meaning within the peer group, but doing gender is about affirming gendered stereotypes within the aforementioned(prenominal) group, the two ways of understanding and making sense of the world are at odds. Girls Filtering Fantasy through ExperienceFantasy and the dream world informed the ways the girls discussed the tale. They often combined the fantasy world with their day-after-day lived experience to create a space for their own storytelling and/or interaction with the text. Many of the children discussed the text in wrong of how their lives did or did not repeat the fairy tale, bu t the girls repeatedly engaged in fantasizing about their futures as we read. Sometimes the girls would decide that the ideology of the fairy tale world and their personal expectations for the future conflicted. Bridget I am going to get married to a prince. He is oing to meet me at the ball. gets up and dances around in a small circle Karen I dont think they have balls anymore. Bridget I am going to have one when I turn 6 Kristi 6? You are 6, dummy. Right? Lana I wouldnt want to go to a ball if that is what happens. marriage Bridget I mean 16. Lana I dont want to get married until I am 23. Bridget Well, I can do what I want. sitting down When the content of the fairy tale enamored children as related to or reflective of their own lives, personal desires, or experiences, it was obvious that their interest in the tale was elevated.This process of identifying with the text seemed to speck reality with fantasy. It was when the text did not strike the children as reflective of their lives that the processes of interpretation and group interaction were most clear. At these times, the children worked to create an image that was more reflective of their lived experience. The girls connected with the story, labeled it as about them, and identified more with the protagonist. There were also times, however, when they acknowledged identification with the less positively identified characters (e. g. , those Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 haracterized as bad or ugly, such as the stepsisters). When they discussed the stepsisters behavior toward Cinderella, the children rundle in terms of their own punishment for similar misdeeds.Bridget They are very, very, very, very selfish. Karen They should get a swat. Kristi Swats her own bottom. I have had a swat. Bridget On the bottom Many of the girls discussed the tale in terms of what they had done or would like to do, who they are or would like to be. The girls sometimes seemed envious of Cinderella. For example, one girl asked, with a voice full of anxiousness, ow Cinderella got to be so beautiful, and stated that she wanted to be as beautiful as Cinderella. Even at age 6, a girl knows that beauty is rewarded in our society. LBS What does Cinderella look like? Isabel Very, very, very beautiful. Shelly She probably looks very pretty with platinum-blonde hair touches her brown hair and blue eyes. touching near her own brown eyes Isabel I have blond hair touching her hair and blue eyes Shelly swats Isabel This passage illustrates how children identify with a story, discussing it in terms of how the characters are like them and how the situations parallel their experiences.Furthermore, the girls were interested in what might be in store for them as adults by assuming that what happens in the tale might happen in their lives as well. Currie (1997) argued that the adolescent girls in her study gave the messages in teen magazines ontological status, that they saw them as true and reflective of their own lives. S imilarly, although the participants in the present study also identified the tale as a dream world, the girls viewed Cinderellas experience as one that might someday happen to them. In so doing, they embraced the ideological messages about emininity, yet, at the same time, negotiated, added to, and subtracted from the tale as they filtered the messages through their own experiences, hopes, and desires. For example, they were particularly interested in Cinderellas new married life. Kristi Does Cinderella have babies after she gets married? LBS The book does not say what do you think? Kristi She should have babies, and she will change diapers, right? LBS If they have babies, do you think the prince will change diapers? Chorus No The girls offered interpretations that existed within the traditional framework of the text.Corsaro (1997) asserted hat children engage in interpretive reproduction, and, in so doing, they borrow from adult culture and renegotiate the messages in a reflexive p rocess of delimitate and (re) Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 producing what is real. But that they borrow from their own lived experience is clearly evident in many of their discussions and reactions to the text. The girls belief that Cinderella (and they themselves) could marry and experience this traditional love story, at the same time as they realize that parts of the tale simply are not possible (such as the fairy godmother who turns a pumpkin into a coach), or re not realistic for them (marriage at a very young age), speaks to this process. They are taking the reality of their own experiences and blending it, through their discussion, with their understanding of what they are and what they might hope to experience in the future. catch and Damage Girls Peer Culture and Expectations of the Feminine During the reading groups, most girls were excited, often interjecting comments, such as I have Cinderella Barbie, and running ahead in the story. One girl asked to have the story read a gain. Many girls in the reading groups engaged in spontaneous role play.Role play does not usually happen after a story is read in the everyday classroom. As I did not discourage eager comments or the beginnings of role play when they first occurred in each group, they may well have simply taken my cue. One example of particularly exuberant role play occurred after a short debate over Cinderellas age. Meg She was not much older than me in the book. I think she was my age. Carla She was old enough to get married. Meg She grew up in the book. Like this. stands up and twirls around When she got her dress. Do you like my dress? I am going to the ball.Carla No, this is how Cinderella danced. stands and begins dancing Rachel I will be Cinderella when she tries on the shoe. LBS How many Cinderellas are there, anyway? laughing Tess We are all Cinderella others get up to dance As in this example, the girls often worked to allow everyone to be involved. This is not to say that competition fo r the status-filled position of Cinderella did not occur. It did. But, most often, the girls worked together to make meaning of the tale. Role play did not happen routinely with the boys, and they usually stayed seated when the girls were acting out the tale.In the only example of role play in which the boys were actively involved, the prince and his friend left the group to chase dragons before the ball began, about midway through the tale. There were examples of less affiliative interaction between the girls. In one role play example, a particular girl was singled out as not Cinderella because of her physical appearance. It was difficult to witness the 723 interaction when a girl said you cant be Cinderella, but you could be the ugly stepsister. The competition inherent in the story was painful when witnessed in children in the real world.As I stood to bode the end of the reading group, another little girl said to the first Dont listen to her she just doesnt have a nice heart. The gender work in the childrens groups was, in many ways, reflective of the expectations and pressures of the larger adult world. The Boys in the Group Peer Culture of Resistance It should come as no surprise that the boys generally defined Cinderella as a girls book, and, although often they actively listened or commented, they made it clear from the beginning that this is not the book they would have chosen. This was an expected response based upon the hosen text. Even though there were many loud guffaws at the introduction of the text, it was fairly clear that the boys were as familiar with the tale as the girls were. The boys did answer questions and offer comments, but as often as not it was to steer the discussion off track.This tactic was noticeably common among the boys, and they engaged in some friendly competition as to who might be the most successful, complementing each other on a job well done. The boys also rivaled one another for the attention of the group and for m y attention. As we had spent time in other orms of classroom interaction, our relationships were often friendly and familiar. But, when it came to commendation from the group or my approval, the boys usually sought approval from the group. This was often manifested in raucous storytelling. Their stories or comments interested the group because of their (sometimes sexually suggestive) shock value. LBS On Cinderellas feet were..? Mike Shoes. Larry methamphetamine shoes. Chorus Glass slippers Larry It looks like a glass dress I wish it were a glass dress Larry Ha It would be funny if it was Mike And then we could see LBS All right.Her slippers are the only c roachhing item made of glass. One should note here that the student might not have received my approval, but the comment did receive my attention. Teachers often told me that sometimes students would adjudicate notice regardless of the consequences. Although I actively fostered a relationship where the children were less likely to view me as an authority figure, I was, regardless, an adult. Some of the sky responses may simply be attributed to the boys unwillingness to embrace the more romantic images in the tale (and their keen 724 awareness of the repercussions if they did).At one point, a boy broke out in song flavorless singing Happily Ever After and kiss my hand LBS I have a couple of quick questions for you, do you mind answering? No comment LBS What is the Prince like? unconditional Stupid. Ben Dumb. Brian A dummy. Jeremy He got in a coach crash. LBS why? Matt Because he does not even love her. LBS Why? Matt in a gruff voice Because she is rotten to the core LBS What is Cinderella like? Chorus Dumb. LBS courteous or mean? Ben She is a cleaning lady. Matt She loves me. LBS I did not know she had ever met you. Boys laugh The satirical nature of these responses is evident.Not only did the boys challenge the structure of the reading group and my authority as a researcher, but they also pushed the b oundaries in terms of what is considered by adults in the school system to be an acceptable reference to sex and sexuality. In stopping the conversation, my status as an adult was emphasized, which hindered my inclusion to their world. The boys did not elaborate on the tale in ways that identified with the prince, the king, or with Cinderella. Furthermore, the boys did not experience any social rewards from other boys for knowing the story. In fact, ost of the boys adamantly argued that they did not vexation for the story at all and reacted negatively toward any boy who showed any sign of interest in the tale. The only boy who took an interest in the prince used a different characterization than what was offered in the tale, although his description clearly resonates with masculine culture and expectations of male sexuality. find I think the prince has a lot of dances. Joe What? Dances? sic He dances and dances and dances because he likes to kiss lots of girls Joe Oh, yeah, well he does not dance if he doesnt have to. shrugs curb He does have to so he does.Joe Yeah, I would dance if I had to. Mark What? This conversation illustrates the tension between the social expectations that the boys sensed from one another and the larger adult world, as well as the conflicted nature Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 of the traditional stories of heterosexual love and masculinity. Examples such as this, when position with the preceding examples of some of the girls responses, demonstrate the reproduction of larger social norms concerning sexuality and desire, as well as acceptable roles and displays for men and women. The boys were not everlastingly willing to offer a response, resumably for fear of disapproval from the other boys in the group. In one group, for example, I could not elicit a communicative response from any of the boys unless I asked them a direct question, and then I would receive a very short reply. One shrugged his shoulders at a general question aimed at the group the others shifted sidelong glances at each other. They did not seem to feel the need to feign enthusiasm for the book.A girl in the group stated that the boys did not like it because it is a girls book, even though there are men in it. In that particular case, one girl in the group attempted to xplain the boys attitudes toward the tale. The disturbance that the boys calm down produced in the girls was acute, as was evidenced by multiple responses, both self-deprecating comments stated to me and admonitions to the boys. The girls wanted to discuss the tale, and they desired my approval, in part so that I would keep reading. They were embarrassed by the boys lack of enthusiasm, and indicated that they were worried that it might hurt my feelings or cause me to end the reading group. The boys seemed to sense the power of their own silence, even to revel in it, but the girls did not make merry the silence at all.In each of the groups, most of the boys began to diseng age within the first 10 min. Inevitably, one or two boys began quietly to discuss something other than the story, and the other boys quickly tuned in to what it was that they were doing or saying. In fact, if a boy in the group did not become engaged in these other interests, he was often solicited by a boy sitting following(a) to him, or the other boys would look at each other and signal about him. For example, one boy who seemed to be shunned by the group as a whole engaged neither in conversation about the text nor in the boys alternate conversations.Most boys ignored him, although one said Mark likes Cinderella in a derogatory way, to identify Mark as not one of us. Another boy, clearly interested in the tale, quickly recognize that the other boys disapproved after he made an initial comment, and he spent the rest of the reading group attempting to regain his position as one of us by stating that Cinderella stinks. These findings illustrate how gendered behavior is expected of and by boys and girls. Whether Mark had earlier shown an interest in girls stuff or was alienated from the boys as an unpopular student, his gender was suspect and became a means of torment.The second boy is an example of the work commonly done to regulate Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 masculine behavior. Most students were very in-tune with the groups expectations for gendered behavior and quickly accommodated. Davies (2003) argued that teasing and alienation serve to maintain the categorical boundaries between the constructions of femininity and masculinity. This regular, everyday maintenance work was evidenced here in the boys discourse of the group member who deviated from the expected response. Only one boy who spoke positively about the tale was not chastised by the other boys.This casing was also one of the rare occasions when a child offered an alternate image from a media source more reflective of lived experience or identity. Recently there have been a number of attempts to create films of fairy tales that include challenges to traditional messages, such as Rodgers and Hammersteins Cinderella (1997), starring Brandy, a young African American woman, as Cinderella. Rodgers and Hammersteins Cinderella was also produced by Disney Studios. LBS How many of you liked that story? Derrick I have the movie, but Cinderella is Black. LBS Do you have the movie with Brandy in it?Derrick Yes. This student, an African American, referenced the images from this alternate source. No one in his group, however, seemed to be familiar with this version, and only two other children in other reading groups mentioned the alternate Disney version of the tale. Discussion As has been previously argued, and is evidenced by the data in the present study, there are very few children who have not been exposed to Walt Disneys Cinderella. The assertion that the media serve as vehicles of womens subordination is a common element among theories of gender and gender socialising. The fa ct that children onsume stories like Cinderella on an everyday basis, and that stories often reify highly gendered constructions of behavior and roles, encourages us to look closely at the messages within the media to which children are exposed (Baker-Sperry and Grauerholz 2003). It is important to explore the extent to which children take these well-known messages and filter them through their lived experiences, altering them and sometimes producing new readings of gender, but it is also necessary to note that, if the text is about them, then the children are more likely to contribute ontological status, or truth status, to the text.This is further unified by conflict between groups, as in this case between the boys and girls responses to the text. The boys did not find themselves reflected in the text therefore they did not elevate the text to truth status. There are other stories that resonate more soundly with the construct of masculinity. 725 The very act of defining the text a s a girls book authenticates the assumptions of gender difference for the boys and girls. The childrens behavior within the reading groups was highly influenced by group interaction. This is in keeping with Corsaros (1992) assertion that most socialization ccurs at the level of interaction, be it in the family, among peers, or elsewhere. The nods and sounds of approval from group members encouraged both bankers acceptance of the media messages and interaction and interpretation of those messages, depending upon the perspective of the group. An uncomfortable group atmosphere was often evident in conjunction with doing gender. The girls and boys were highly influenced by the group, and acceptance or rejection of the text was enhanced by whether or not the children identified with the story, whether they thought that it was or was not about them.This is no doubt one of the reasons that the boys in the present study did not enjoy the tale, or did not openly admit to doing so. Cinderel la is a text that resonates with social messages aimed toward girls (e. g. , social rewards for goodness, kindness, and care as well as an emphasis on feminine beauty) and does not problematize a beauty ideal, romantic love, or competition among women for a the attention of men. The messages routinely found in books for boys, such as an emphasis on strength, the ability to protect others, and the denial of emotions (Seiter 1993), are not prevalent in Cinderella.The girls embraced the story, identified with the female characters, and actively engaged in filtering the text through their lived experience and expectations of the future. They clearly took pleasure, for the most part, in reenacting the fairy tale, taking particular delight in the transformation of a young, downtrodden girl into a beautiful princess. The tale was well known, and well loved, by most of the girls. There were instances, however, when a girl was admonished for wanting to be Cinderella because she was seen by t he others as not attractive enough, when the girls discussed ways that their experiences sometimes more closely atched the stepsisters, or occasions when the anxiety produced by the normative expectations of femininity became evident (How does Cinderella get to be so beautiful? ). But, for the most part, the acceptance was unanimous and excited. Through the girls discussion of the story, traditional expectations for femininity were identified, reified, and reinforced. The strong identification with the tale, as evidenced by the girls, is an indication of the social importance of traditional expectations of femininity. In light of previous research that has identified girls as active negotiators in the construction of meaning (Corsaro 1997Currie 1997), the implicit response to the traditional elements of the tale signifies the importance of gendered Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 726 expectations and the solidness of gendered boundaries. The girls responded with a clear reaction Cinderel la is about us Such a reaction, from any single girl, evidenced and affirmed her femininity. Cinderella was not, however, about or for the boys. As a feminine tale, any association might be seen as feminizing for them. This supports a traditional ideology associated with heterosexual masculinity. Furthermore, it might be xpected that a boy would respond differently, possibly more positively, outside of the group setting (e. g. , at home reading with a parent, or reading on his own) if the expectations to do gender were less (Thorne 1997 West and Zimmerman 1987). Through group displays, the boys demonstrated resistance to the messages in the tale and reinforced group acceptance of normative masculinity.The textual association with romantic love, messages traditionally directed toward women and girls (e. g. , domestic work, competition for men, emphasis on beauty), and the packaging of the text (i. e. , colors of pink and purple with cute animals) inherent in Cinderella simply do not function with boys experiences in learning about masculinity or the cultural expectations of them. These conflicts are reinforced through interaction in the peer group, and the peer group often regulated interpretation. The boys also actively moved the story to a place that was more about them. In this way, they de-centered the central character and alternatively turned to other components of popular fairy tales that are more enkindle to them, such as chasing dragons and engaging in adventurous sword play. They also shifted the focus from the story in general to hallenging my authority as its reader. This is particularly interesting given the friendly and affiliative behavior I previously had experienced when interacting with the boys during in-class observation, when they were either doing assigned work or engaging in more routine (and less gendered) everyday activities.This is in keeping with their quick and crucial treatment of each other when gender boundaries were crossed. Davies (2003) identified similar responses in the preschool children she observed. Corsaros assertions concerning the influence of the peer group on the interpretation and production of meaning were evident in he reading groups conducted for the present study. The children actively participated in peer socialization through the use of encouragement, enticement, pleading, and, sometimes, ridicule. The children dealt with the messages and images together, often make on one another s sentences and nodding in obligation at the final product. At other times, their disagreement contributed to an understanding of the complexities of the questions raised. The boys and girls produced and affirmed meanings consistent with their gender, and actively worked to ensure these processes.These findings indicate that the work of doing gender West and Zimmerman 1987) plays an essential role in the process of interpretation for children. Aydt and Corsaro (2003) argued that this is particularly the ca se for middleclass, American children. The highly formalized classroom may reify the gendered categories boys and girls, thereby constraining group interaction and the ability to engage freely in the negotiation process. Further research in other kinds of social settings would more clearly indicate the relationship between formal structure and agency.Children are engaging in a process of resisting and conforming, of forming and producing meaning, through heir everyday reading of stories and through their interactions in peer culture. The present study serves to emphasize the power and autonomy of the childs world, yet, also illustrates that none of us, children included, by the piece create and interpret gendered understandings. Such a process is necessarily a social one that is finely entrenched in the beliefs and cultural expectations of gendered difference. References Agee, J. M. (1993). Mothers and daughters Gender-role socialization in two unusedbery award books. Childrens Li terature in Education, 24, clxv183. Aydt, H. , & Corsaro, W. (2003).Differences in childrens construction of gender across culture. American behavioural Scientist, 46, 13051325. Baker-Sperry, L. , & Grauerholz, L. (2003). The pervasiveness and persistence of the feminine beauty ideal in childrens fairy tales. Gender & Society, 17, 711726. Bettelheim, B. (1976). The uses of enchantment. New York Vintage Books. Corsaro, W. (1992). Interpretive reproduction in childrens peer cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 160177. Corsaro, W. (1997). The sociology of childhood. Berkeley, CA Pine lick Press. Currie, D. (1997). Decoding femininity Advertisements and their teenage readers.Gender & Society, 11, 453477. Davies, B. (1990). Agency as a form of discursive practice A classroom scene observed. British ledger of Sociology of Education, 11, 341361. Davies, B. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tales Preschool children and gender. Creskill, NJ Hampton. Disney, W. (1950). Cinderella Film. Burbank, CA Walt Disney Studios. Disney, W. (1986). Cinderella. New York, NY Western Publishing. Eder, D. , & Corsaro, W. (1999). Ethnographic studies of children and youth. journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 28, 520 531. Sex Roles (2007) 56717727 Gledhill, C. (1985). Genre and gender The case of soap opera.In S. Hall (Ed. ), Representation (pp. 339383). London Sage. Grauerholz, L. , & Baker-Sperry, L. (2007). Feminist research in the public domain Risks and recommendations. Gender & Society, 21 (2),272294. Hibbard, D. , & Buhrmester, D. (1998). The role of peers in the socialization of gender-related social interaction styles. Sex Roles, 39, 185202. Milkie, M. (1994). Social world approach to cultural studies. journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 23, 354381. Miller, P. , Potts, R. , Fung, H. , Hoogstra, L. , & Mintz, J. (1990). Narrative practices and the social construction of self in childhood.American Ethnologist, 17, 292311. Pike, J. , & Jennings. , N. (2005). The make of commercials on childrens perceptions of gender appropriate toy use. Sex Roles, 52, 8391. Rodgers, R. , & Hammerstein, O. (Producers) (1997). Cinderella film. Los Angeles, CA ABCs Wonderful World of Disney. 727 Seiter, E. (1993). Sold separately Parents & children in consumer culture. New Brunswick, NJ Rutgers University Press. Shumway, D. (2003). Modern love Romance, intimacy, and the marriage crisis. New York, NY New York University Press. Tatar, M. (1993). Off with their heads Fairy tales and the culture of childhood.Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press. Thorne, B. (1997). Gender play Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, New Jersey Rutgers University Press. U. S. Bureau of the Census (2000). socioeconomic profile for the Macomb zip code area 61455 (110th ed. ). Washington, DC U. S. Government impression Office. Weitzman, L. , Eifler, D. , Hokada, E. , & Ross, C. (1972). Sex role socialization in picture books for preschool children. American daybook of Sociology, 77 , 11251150. West, C. , & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125151. Zipes, J. (1997). Happily ever after. New York Routledge.