“Lord of the Flies”: Qualities of a Good Leader Essay

What qualities does it take to identify a computable attracter? People have always pondered this hesitancy especially when electing leaders. They may say that a legal leader should be charismatic, sizeable and perhaps correct- recordd. Their idea of good leadership qualities usually comes from books and movies. In Lord of the Flies there were many various leadership qualities exhibited by the boys, but how can one decide on a leader out of so many boys that would make the company work? simply a leader with the best of the boys character traits would have made the society work. For example, we can see that Ralph was system of logical, but lacked the ability to make quick decisions. On the contrary, Jack was decisive, yet not very logical or civil. Finally, neandertal was the intelligent advisor, how incessantly he lacked the charisma and appearance to bring out his ideas reliable by the crowd.Ralph was a logical and prestigious leader, but lacked the ability to right a way enforce the directions. His logical reasoning process helped in identifying the necessities for life. For example, he valued such necessities as energise and shelter above everything else. These were the necessities that would have direct them to a stable and civilized society on the island. However, although Ralph had the right ideas, he was not too quick or efficient in acquire them make. In fact, the fire was very much let out. Similarly, the shelters were something that seemed there to be done until there was something more exciting, at which point the shelters were left un polish offd.Without direction, the boys on the island practically went to do things that were fun. This lack of direction was not at all out-of-pocket to a lack of power. The boys instantly viewed Ralph as a leader with his influential looks and speech. For instance, when Ralph verbalise fire, the boys went running towards the woods to build a fire. This human body of authority over the boys was exceptionally important for getting things done, unfortunately Ralph did not use his authority to its fullest. As can be seen, Ralph had the power and logic to do things, yet he lacked the decisiveness to do them right away.In blood to Ralph, Jack was an aggressive instigator, who was always quick to act. Jack was an intimidating figure. The boys often feared what he would do should they not listen to him. Similar to Ralph, this control would alter Jack to get things done. Contrary to Ralph, however, Jack used thiscontrol. He took his chorus with him hunting whenever he saw fit. By organism decisive, he could quickly and efficiently get things done. However, his decisiveness was not necessarily a good thing, as Jack was very aggressive in nature. His savage nature influenced the others to let their savage sides come out, most noticeably when they were hunting. They would all blusher their faces and carry as little as possible. Since Jack was doing it, it was the thing to do. A good leader would not encourage or intimidate mess to let out their aggression. Simply put, Jack was decisive and intimidating, but back up the wrong actions in the boys.Last but not least, Piggy was the intelligent advisor to Ralph, yet lacked some important qualities. Piggys comprehension was a very important asset to the boys. He knew how things had to be done. Additionally, he had many ideas that would lead the boys to a civilized and safe society. This kind of knowledge is important to any good leadership. Unfortunately, Piggy was not a good public speaker. Not only did he lack the breath to complete a long speech, but he was very shy being a minority group on the island. It is this disadvantage that would prevent him from ever leading, because a good leader must be able to return his ideas clearly.Despite not being good at communicating his receive ideas, he was open to others ideas. He would consider them and give his own inferential criticism. For example, he agreed with Ralph that fire was important, and suggested that if they could not have a fire on top of the mountain, then to have it by the shore. Any good leader must listen to others ideas as any one person can not have all of the best ideas. Piggys give-and-take is vital to good leadership.As can be seen, the combine leadership qualities of Ralph, Jack and Piggy would have most likely worked in creating a civilization on the island. Ralphs logic, appearance, and influential speeches can unravel the group to do what is important. Jacks decisiveness can get the important things done quickly and efficiently. Finally Piggys intelligence would provide important information as to how to accomplish various goals, and would occur the island in a civilized manner. None of the boys could have led the group towards a working society by themselves. In conclusion, after intelligence this dispersement of leadership qualities in Lord of the Flies, can itreally be said that any single person is a good leader?